The united states did not shy away from using strategic weapons (b-29s) for tactical purpose against north korea what message would the use of the bomb have sent. Should america have dropped atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki america's use of atomic bombs to attack the japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki in august 1945 has long remained one of the most controversial decisions of the second world war. Of course the above posters also have good answers and this should show the fact that history is all about interpretation, opinion, and speculation and not simply a matter of facts and figures as. Best answer: at the time yes, in retrospect, no wwii was horrible, by the time truman made the decision, tens of millions of people were dead the us had lost around 400,000 soldiers, though most of those were in eur. Washington, dc, august 5, 2005-sixty years ago this month, the united states dropped atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki, the soviet union declared war on japan, and the japanese government surrendered to the united states and its allies.
Did the united states have to drop the bomb thousands of new york times readers have responded to a request, 70 years after the attacks on hiroshima and nagasaki, to consider the argument that. Should the united states have dropped the atomic bomb on august 6, 1945, the united states dropped an atomic bomb on the japanese city of hiroshima the bomb killed some 80,000 people in a flash and left about 120,000 more to die an agonizing death from burns and radiation- (bulliet, pg 797. The united states had dropped an atomic bomb on the city of hiroshima today many argue whether or not the us should have taken such a drastic measure was it entirely necessary that we drop such a devastating weapon. Forty years ago tuesday, the united states dropped the first atomic bomb used in war on hiroshima, japan the bomb killed 78,000 people japan surrendered nine days later president harry truman.
The united states should not have dropped the bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki because it went against the rules of war and the japanese would have surrendered soon anyway the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki should falls into the characterization of war crimes and crimes of humanity. Which germany city would the united states have dropped the atom bomb on in wwii if one had been available before the surrender of nazi german would germany have surrendered if a german city had been destroyed by an atom bomb in 1945. Some ranking leaders of the united nations have suggested that the united states government has been projecting a negative image of the un, although this allegation is denied by the us few observers expect the us out of un  movement to result in the us actually withdrawing for the foreseeable future. Hiroshima and nagasaki might not have been the best decisions the united states has ever made but in reality, the war was ended quick and that was the major goal i don't know what to believe because as i have shown, there are good arguments presented by both sides.
The 2005 textbook a history of the united states adopts a familiar tone, arguing that president truman based his decision to drop the bomb mainly on a complex calculus of the cost in human lives if the war were to continue: should the united states use the atomic bomb no one knew how long japan would hold out. The president's historic visit took place 71 years after the us dropped an atomic bomb on the city during world war ii, one of two it used during that conflict. And if the japanese were crazily intransigent, we could have simply dropped another a-bomb, closer to tokyo or in a low-population area even another, if needed.
The mainstream position in the united states from 1945 through the 1960s regarded the bombings as the decisive factor in ending the war commentators have termed this the traditionalist view, or pejoratively the patriotic orthodoxy. There were reasons for and reasons against the united states dropping the atomic bombs on japan i will focus on why we shouldn't have dropped the atomic bombs on japan. In this op-ed i argue against the us having dropped the atomic bomb on japan during world war ii. I accept, and assert that the us should not have dropped the atomic bomb dropping the atomic bomb: only the first dropping of the atomic bomb over japan (at hiroshima. The united states, then, dropped the bombs to end the war that japan had unleashed in asia in 1931 and extended to the united states at pearl harbor—and thereby probably avoided an invasion that.
I believe that the united states shouldn't have dropped the bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki because of all the damage it caused to japanese citizens in hiroshima, nagasaki or surrounding cities i think the right thing to do if the atomic bomb was our only choice to end the war, is to drop one on an evacuated iwo jima island. The united states and president truman should have weighed their opting a little bit more before deciding to drop both atomic bombs on the islands of nagasaki and hiroshima show more the benefits of dropping an atomic bomb on japan essay. Best answer: most people are in horror of the two atomic bombs dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki, but is that horror justified first lets examine some of the myths associated with these events. Why the united states dropped the atomic bomb: persuasive essay the atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy since its first detonation in 1945, the entire world has heard the aftershocks of that blast.
The united states of america dropped the first atomic bomb little boy on hiroshima on the 6th of august, 1945, and the second atomic bomb fat man on nagasaki on the 9th of august, 1945. The united states becomes the first and only nation to use atomic weaponry during wartime when it drops an atomic bomb on the japanese city of hiroshima though the dropping of the atomic bomb on.
On august 6, 1945, the united states dropped one atomic bomb over the city of hiroshima killing around 80,000 people three days later, the united states dropped the second atomic bomb over the city of nagasaki killing nearly 40,000 people. Regardless, the united states remains the only nation in the world to have used a nuclear weapon on another nation truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military a normandy-type amphibious landing would have cost an estimated million casualties.